1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 LAURNETTE PERSON, Case No.2:25-CV-814 JCM (EJY)O

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v.

10 CLARK COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER,

11 Defendant(s).

12 13 This case stems from allegations of harassment, discrimination, and retaliation under Title 14 VII and, potentially, the Americans with Disabilities Act. (ECF No. 3). The Equal Employment 15 Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) dated January 3, 2025. (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff was required 16 to file her complaint within 90 days of the date she received the Right to Sue letter, yet she did not 17 bring suit until May 9, 2025. (ECF No. 1). Therefore, the letter is untimely, and plaintiff cannot 18 proceed in federal court based on clams raised in the charge of discrimination filled with the 19 EEOC. 20 No objections were filed to the R&R. Thus, the court is not obligated to conduct a de novo 21 review of the R&R.

(b)(1) (requiring courts to “make a de novo determination of 22 those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United 23 States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“[T]he district judge must 24 review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 25 otherwise.”). 26 . . . 27 . . . 28 . . . 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judge Youchah’s R&R 3 (ECF No. 5) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED, in full. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk is 5 instructed to close this case. 6 DATED October 7, 2025. 7 _________________________________________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28