Shawn Lamar Hunt v. Assa Abloy Entrance Systems US, Inc., et al.
Shawn Lamar Hunt v. Assa Abloy Entrance Systems US, Inc., et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 SHAWN LAMAR HUNT, 4 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01980-GMN-EJY 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND ASSA ABLOY ENTRANCE SYSTEMS US, RECOMMENDATION 7 INC., et al.,
8 Defendants.
9
10
11 12 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 33), 13 of United States Magistrate Elayna J. Youchah, which recommends denying Plaintiff’s 14 Emergency Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. 15 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 16 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 17 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 18 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 19 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 20 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 21 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 22 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 23 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 24140, 149 (1985) (citing
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 25 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 1 || filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna—Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1122(9th Cir. 2003). 2 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 3 || No. 33) (setting a September 5, 2025, deadline for objections). 4 Accordingly, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 33), is 6 || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Leave to Amend 8 ||Complaint (ECF No. 17) is DENIED. 9 Dated this _15 day of October, 2025. 10 Yj, □ Gloria M. Nayarro, District Judge 12 United M. Maar, D Court 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Page 2 of 2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown