Sanwire Corporation v. Intercept Music Group, Inc., et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Sanwire Corporation v. Intercept Music Group, Inc., et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

SANWIRE CORPORATION, Case No. 2:25-cv-01533-ART-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order [Docket No. 36] INTERCEPT MUSIC GROUP, INC., et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan and scheduling order. 12] Docket No. 36. 13 The proposed discovery plan improperly imposes a stay of discovery pending the 14] resolution of Defendant’s motion to dismiss and/or stay, without addressing the relevant standards. 15] “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery 16] when a potentially dispositive motion is pending.” Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.,

278 F.R.D. 597, 17

] 601 (D. Nev. 2011). 18 Accordingly, the joint discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 36. The 19] parties are ORDERED to submit an amended joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, 20] or a proper request to stay discovery pending resolution of the motion to dismiss addressing the 21} relevant standards, by October 23, 2025. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: October 16, 2025 24 7 ASS 25 United Stee Magi trate Judge 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown