Cornelius E. Brown v. Hartman, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Cornelius E. Brown v. Hartman, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 CORNELIUS E. BROWN, Case No. 3:23-CV-00618-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HARTMAN, et al., ° Defendants. 9 10 On September 24, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 27.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry,

849 F.2d 409

(9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland,

154 F.3d 952

(9th Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 28.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Monday, 15 | November 17, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further 16 | extensions of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be 17 | submitted to the Court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: October 17, 2025 20 .

21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown