1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5] Carlott Lee Dixon, Case No. 2:25-cv-01609-JAD-NJK 6 Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and Recommendation Vv. 8] SNRHA, et al., ECF No. 6 9 Defendant 10 On 9/29/25, the magistrate judge entered this report and recommendation [ECF No. 6]: On August 29, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to

] 1915(e). Docket No. 3. The Court dismissed the complaint for failing to state a claim and failing 12 to substantiate federal subject matter jurisdiction: 13 Plaintiff's complaint in this case is largely blank. It would appear that this is a landlord-tenant dispute in which Plaintiff claims she 14 was wrongfully evicted and that her property was damaged. The complaint fails to comply with the Rule 8 requirements to set forth 15 coherently who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough detail to guide discovery. Moreover and significantly, 16 the complaint fails to explain how this federal court has jurisdiction over a landlord-tenant dispute. Although the complaint indicates 17 that the case involves “a federal law or right,” the complaint does not identify any federal law or right that is implicated in the case. 18 Hence, the complaint fails to show that federal law creates the cause of action or that a substantial question of federal law is a necessary 19 element. Docket No. 3 at 3 (internal citations omitted). The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an amended 21} complaint by September 19, 2025, warning that failing to do so “will result in the recommended 22|| dismissal of this case.” /d. at 4 (emphasis in original). 23 Despite that warning, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or sought extension of 24] the subject deadline. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be 25] DISMISSED without prejudice. 26 27 Dated: September 29, 2025 ZS x. Nancy J. Koppe 28 United States Magistrate Judge

1 ORDER 2 The deadline for any party to object to this recommendation was 10/13/25, and no party 3| filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate 4] judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 5]

(9th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find 6|| good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s 7|| Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ADOPTED in its entirety, and THIS CASE IS 8|| DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation. The Clerk of Court is 9| directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. 10

12 US. District Judge en (fen)A. Dorsey Dated: October 20, 2025 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28