2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 oR OK 6 KASEY DAVID CARROLL, Case No. 2:25-cv-00153-RFB-BNW 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER 9] OFFICER D. ALTORE, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) □□ 13 | the Honorable Judge Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on April 4, 14] 2025. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole orinpart, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may 16] file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U-S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the 18] district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 19] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 20] U-S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, 21] district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report 22] and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Am,

(1985). Pursuan 23 | to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by April 17, 2025. No objections have been filed 24] The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. 26} /// 27) /I// 28) ///

1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is 2| ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 5 The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to close this case. 6 7 DATED: October 21, 2025. 8 : As 10 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-