1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA NATHAN RISH, Case No.: 2:25-cv-01421-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF Nos. 5, 21] MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, 7 Defendant 8 On October 8, 2025, Magistrate Judge Weksler granted the plaintiff's motion to amend, requested the clerk of court to detach and file the plaintiffs amended complaint, and recommended that I deny the defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 21. No one objected. 11} Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 121U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. 14] Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 15}| magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 21) is accepted, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is denied as moot. 20 I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of court to detach and file the plaintiff's amended complaint (ECF No. 16-1). 22 DATED this 23rd day of October, 2025. ZL. 23 wr ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE