1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3}| Jeromy Oelker, Case No. 2:25-cv-01589-CDS-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation V. 6|| State of Idaho, et al., [ECF No. 4] 7 Defendants 8 9 Plaintiff Jeromy Oelker filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis alongside a 10] complaint seeking to “transfer and forward” cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Compl., ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler screened 12]| Oelker’s complaint, then issued a report and recommendation (R&R). R@R, ECF No. 4. The 13]| recommends that I dismiss Oelker’s complaint because, rather than stating a new cause of 14]| action, it instead seeks to appeal the decisions in case numbers 2:25-cv-00427-JAD-BNW and 15]] 2:25-cv-00528-JAD-DJA. Id. at 2. 16 Oelker had until October 22, 2025, to file any objections to the RR. Id. at 3 (citing 17|| Local Rule IB 3-2(a) (stating that parties wishing to object to an R@R must file specific written 18|| objections with supporting points and authorities within fourteen days)); see also 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) (same). To date, Oelker has neither objected nor requested more time to do so. 20]| As no objection is filed, I adopt the R@R in full and dismiss this action with prejudice.! 21 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 4] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is now dismissed with 23}| prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to close this case. 24 Dated: October 24, 2025 bikin — Cristina D. Sitva 26 / ited States District Judge “TN ]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone,

(D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn,

(1985); United States v. Reyna- Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003).