Ammar Harris v. Clark County, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Ammar Harris, Case No. 2:22-cv-00560-RFB-NJK 6 Plaintiff(s), ORDER Vv.

8] Clark County, et al., [Docket No. 95] 9 Defendant(s).

10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for additional service attempts on 11] Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, A. Ortiz, and A. Beas. Docket No. 95.!

12) LVMPD and Ortiz have since appeared by filing a motion to dismiss, Docket No. 97, so that aspect 13] of the motion is now moot. As to Defendant Beas, summons was previously returned unexecuted 14] for lack of a badge number and full name, see Docket No. 94 at 16-18, and Plaintiff has now 15] provided a badge number, see Docket No. 95 at 2. LVMPD must file a response to this aspect of 16] the motion by November 24, 2025.

17 IT IS SO ORDERED.

18 Dated: November 17, 2025 Nancy J. Koppe\, _ 20 United States"Magistrate Judge ' The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 28] prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013).