Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al.
Wilson Earl Love v. State of Nevada, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Wilson Earl Love, Case No. 2:25-cv-01042-CDS-NJK
5 Plaintiff Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Closing Case 6 v.
7 State of Nevada, et al., [ECF No. 10]
8 Defendants
9 10 Plaintiff Wilson Love initiated this lawsuit by filing an application to proceed in forma 11 pauperis (IFP) alongside his complaint. ECF No. 1; ECF No. 1-1. United States Magistrate Judge 12 Nancy J. Koppe granted Love’s IFP application, screened his complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 131915(e)(2), and dismissed Love’s claims with leave to amend. Order, ECF No. 5. After screening 14 Love’s amended complaint, Judge Koppe issued a report and recommendation (R&R) that I 15 dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice because Love’s claims are barred by the Heck 16 doctrine and the statute of limitations, and because Love fails to adequately plead a civil rights 17 claim. R&R, ECF No. 10 at 3 (citing Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 484(1994)). 18 Love had until October 31, 2025, to file any objections to the R&R. Local Rule IB 3-2(a) 19 (stating that parties wishing to object to an R&R must file specific written objections with 20 supporting points and authorities within fourteen days); see also
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) 21 (same). Love has neither objected to the R&R nor requested more time to do so. Thus, “no 22 review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are 23 filed.” Schmidt v. Johnstone,
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226(D. Ariz. 2003); see Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 24 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
328 F.3d 1114, 1121(9th Cir. 2003). I nonetheless reviewed 25 the magistrate judge’s findings and agree with the analysis and conclusion. So I accept the R&R 26 in full. 1 Conclusion 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 3] R&R [ECF No. 10] is accepted and adopted in its entirety. This action is dismissed with prejudice. 5 The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment accordingly, and to close this 6]| case. /, ) / 7 Dated: November 14, 2025 LZ Cristiha B. Silva 9 Uni d States District Judge 10 / ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Reference
- Status
- Unknown