1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 TINIKA SECAL WARREN, Case No.2:25-CV-1713 JCM (EJY)

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v.

10 JAY WAYNE JENKINS, et al.,

11 Defendant(s).

12 13 Presently before the court is Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah’s report and 14 recommendation (“R&R”). (ECF No. 4). She recommends that plaintiff Tinika Warren’s 15 complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 1-1). 16 No objections were filed to the R&R. Thus, the court is not obligated to conduct a de novo 17 review of the R&R.

(b)(1) (requiring courts to “make a de novo determination of 18 those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United 19 States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“[T]he district judge must 20 review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 21 otherwise.”). 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Judge Youchah’s R&R 24 (ECF No. 4) be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED, in full. 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED with prejudice. 26 DATED November 19, 2025. 27 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28