Brit F. Augborne v. Metro Police Officer Connor Malone, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Brit F. Augborne v. Metro Police Officer Connor Malone, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 BRIT F. AUGBORNE, 4 Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00769-GMN-BNW 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND METRO POLICE OFFICER CONNOR RECOMMENDATION 7 MALONE, et al.,

8 Defendants.

9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 28), 10 of United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends that this action be 11 dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline. 12 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 13 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B); 14 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 15 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 16 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 17 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 18 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 19 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 20 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 21

140, 149 (1985) (citing

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 22 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 23 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1122

(9th Cir. 2003). 24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 25 No. 28) (setting a October 29, 2025, deadline for objections). Accordingly, the Court adopts the 1 in full. 2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 28), is 4 |} ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED for failure to file an 6 || amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline. 7 The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to close this case. 8 Dated this _24 day of November, 2025. : i, □ Gloria M. Naar, District Judge I United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown