Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., et al v. Light & Wonder, Inc., et al

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Aristocrat Technologies, Inc., et al, 2:24-cv-00382-GMN-MDC Plaintiff(s), ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION vs TO AMEND DISCOVERY PLAN AND 6 SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF NO. 320) AND GRANTING THE MOTIONS TO SEAL Light & Wonder, Inc., et al, (ECF NOS. 322 AND 331) 8 Defendant(s).

10 The Court has reviewed plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF || No. 320) and related briefs.

12 IT IS ORDERED that the related Motions to Seal at ECF Nos. 322 and 331 are GRANTED.

13 || The documents sought to be sealed are unredacted portions of briefs and exhibits that concern discovery, || non-dispositive matters, and the parties have shown good cause to support filing such unredacted || documents under seal. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) and || its progeny.

17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Amend Discovery Plan and Scheduling || Order (ECF No. 320) is DENIED. The Court finds the parties did not meaningfully meet and confer.

19 || In addition, the parties shall comply with the Court’s 8/26/24 Standing Order (ECF No. 97), particularly || engaging in meaningful and earnest meet and confer, to address this discovery dispute.

21 Dated: December 5, 2025.

22 Z eo a a iF a 23 (fp ix 04 tee = Hon. Maximilfatio D. Couvillig# TI 25 L United 1 ) Jytige