District Court, D. Nevada, 2025

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. D&J Enterprise LLC, et al.

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. D&J Enterprise LLC, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided December 8, 2025
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. D&J Enterprise LLC, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01837-GMN-EJY 5 vs. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND D&J ENTERPRISE LLC, et al., RECOMMENDATION Defendants.

9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 15), of United States Magistrate Elayna J. Youchah, which recommends granting Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment, (ECF No. 14).

12 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 21 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF No. 15) (setting a November 28, 2025, deadline for objections).

1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 15), is || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered as follows: $110,760.00 || against Defendant Dionne Jupiter.

7 Dated this __8 day of December, 2025.

9 aoa Mh Gloria M. Yay arro, District Judge 10 United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.