1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 2:25-cv-01452-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff, Order v. [Docket No. 33] 9! ALL TYPE LLC, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan and scheduling order. 12] Docket No. 33. 13 The proposed discovery plan improperly imposes a stay of discovery pending the 14] resolution of Defendants’ motions to dismiss, without addressing the relevant standards. “The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide for automatic or blanket stays of discovery when 16] a potentially dispositive motion is pending.” Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.,

, 601 17] (D. Nev. 2011). 18 Accordingly, the joint discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 33. The 19] parties are ORDERED to submit an amended joint proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, 20] or a proper request to stay discovery pending resolution of the motions to dismiss addressing the 21] relevant standards, by December 16, 2025. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: December 9, 2025 <p Nancy J. Koppe 25 United States/Magistrate Judge 26 27 28