Ricardo M. Thornton v. Diana Lopez, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Ricardo M. Thornton v. Diana Lopez, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Ricardo M. Thornton, 4 2:25-cv-02164-JAD-MDC Plaintiff(s), 5 vs. ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION (ECF NO. 1) AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF 6 TO PAY PARTIAL FEE Diana Lopez, et al., 7 Defendant(s). 8 9 Pro se plaintiff Ricardo M. Thornton filed a renewed Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis 10 (“IFP”). ECF No. 1. The Court GRANTS the IFP application. Id. Since plaintiff is incarcerated, the 11 Court orders that plaintiff must pay the initial partial filing fee of $32.00 toward the full $405.00 filing 12 fee. 13 14 I. LEGAL STANDARD 15 Under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or 16 security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff “is unable to 17 pay such fees or give security therefor.” If the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(h), 18 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), he must pay the entire fee in installments, 19 regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. 20 Delatoore,

281 F.3d 844, 847

(9th Cir. 2002). Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP 21 must submit a "certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 22 prisoner for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint."

28 U.S.C. § 23

1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King,

398 F.3d 1113

, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account 24 statement, the Court must assess an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the 25 account for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1);

28 U.S.C. § 1

1915(b)(4). 2 The institution having custody of the prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 3 4 20% of the preceding month's income, in any month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and 5 forward those payments to the Court until the entire filing fee is paid. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(2). Even 6 if this action is dismissed, the prisoner must still pay the full filing fee pursuant to § 1915(b) and the 7 monthly payments from his inmate account will continue until the balance is paid. 8 II. PLAINTIFF’S IFP APPLICATION 9 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed a complete IFP application that 10 includes a declaration and a certified copy of the trust fund account statement per

28 U.S.C. § 11

12 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff’s application states that he is unemployed as he is currently incarcerated.

Id. at 2

. 13 On the date that plaintiff submitted his financial certificate to the to the accounting specialist, the 14 institution calculated that plaintiff’s average monthly deposits are $160.00. ECF No. 1-1 at 1. The 15 institution calculated that his partial filing fee should be $32.00.

Id.

The Court grants plaintiff's IFP 16 application, and the Court orders plaintiff to pay the initial partial filing fee of $32.00. The entire 17 $405.00 filing fee will remain due from plaintiff, and the institution where plaintiff is incarcerated will 18 collect money toward the payment of the full filing fee when plaintiff's institutional account has a 19 sufficient balance, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §1915

. The entire $405.00 filing fee will remain due and 20 payable and will be collected from plaintiff's institutional account regardless of the outcome of this 21 action. 22 Upon receipt of the initial partial filing fee, the court will screen plaintiff's complaint as required 23 by

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915

(e)(2) and 1915A(a); Lopez v. Smith,

203 F.3d 1122

, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) 24 25 (noting that § 1915(e)'s screening requirement "applies to all in forma pauperis complaints"); see also 2 Brown v. Lever, Case No. 2:17-cv-00828-JAD-PAL,

2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53688

, at *5 (D. Nev. Apr. 1 7, 2017). If the complaint states a valid claim for relief, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to issue 2 summons to the defendant(s) and instruct the United States Marshal Service to serve the summons and 3 4 complaint. Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3); LSR 1-3(c) (requiring that a prisoner's initial partial filing fee be 5 paid "before the Court will order service of process"). 6 IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 7 1. Plaintiff’s Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. 8 2. By January 14, 2026, plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $32.00 9 (toward the full $405.00 filing fee). 10 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons. The Court will issue a screening order 11 on the complaint after plaintiff pays the initial filing fee and the Court will address the issuance 12 of summons at that time, if applicable. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2). 13 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to MAIL plaintiff two copies of this Order. Plaintiff must 14 make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this Order attached to a check in the 15 amount of the initial partial filing fee. 16 17 5. Pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, beginning the 18 month following plaintiff's payment of the initial partial filing fee, the High Desert State Prison 19 must forward payments from the account of Ricardo M. Thornton (1122352) to the Clerk of the 20 United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits (in 21 months that the account exceeds $10.00) until the full $405.00 filing fee has been paid for this 22 action. If this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 23

1915(b)(2). 24 6. If plaintiff is transferred, the Accounting Supervisor at High Desert State Prison is directed to 25 3 send a copy of this Order to the new place of incarceration and indicate the amount that plaintiff

5 has paid towards his filing fee so that funds may continue to be deducted from his account.

3 7. The Clerk of the Court SHALL send a copy of this Order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's 4 Office and to the High Desert State Prison Accounting Supervisor, 5500 Snyder Avenue, 5 Bldg. 17, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, Nevada 89702. 6 8. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in a recommendation that this case be 7 dismissed with prejudice. . “y a 8 Date: December 15, 2025. Aff A. ff United Svafes Magistrate#udge il d/

13 4 NOTICE

15 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 16 || recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 17 || of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 18 || may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 19 time. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 142

(1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file 20 objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues I waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Yist,

951 F.2d 1153, 1157

(9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist.,

708 F.2d 452

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, plaintiffs must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon

each opposing party’s attorney, or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. 1 Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action. 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 5

Reference

Status
Unknown