Duston Miller v. LVMPD, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6] Duston Miller, Case No. 2:17-cv-02021-RFB-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order LVMPD, et al., 10 Defendants.
11 It appears that Plaintiff has moved without updating the mailing address on the docket.
See Docket Nos. 207, 208 (mail returned as undeliverable). “A party, not the district court, bears 13] the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 14] 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991).
To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 16] of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive 17] sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.
18 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 19] 14, 2026. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL.
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 Dated: December 31, 2025 a Fon et Nancy J. Kopp&s, 23 United States Magistiate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.