Michael Morse v. The Hertz Corporation, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6] Michael Morse, Case No. 2:25-cv-02482-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff, gly. Order The Hertz Corporation, et al., 10 Defendants.

11 It appears that Plaintiff has moved without updating the mailing address on the docket.

12] See Docket No. 11 (mail returned as undeliverable). “A party, not the district court, bears the 13] burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 14] F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To 15] that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification 16] of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive 17] sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1.

18 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by January 19] 14, 2026. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL.

20 IT IS SO ORDERED.

21 Dated: December 31, 2025 a hen. oe Nancy J. Koppe * 23 United States lagistrate Judge