Arthur D’Amario III v. Globe Photos, Inc., et al.

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ARTHUR D’AMARIO III, Case No.: 2:25-cv-02001-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 7] 6|| GLOBE PHOTOS, INC., et al., 7 Defendants 8 On December 3, 2025, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss with prejudice Arthur D’ Amario’s claims against Hard Rock International and his claims for 10} intentional interference with contractual relations, injunctive relief, and declaratory relief.

11|}D’Amario did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 12}|recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is accepted, and plaintiff Arthur D’Amario’s claims against Hard Rock 19} International and his claims for intentional interference with contractual relations, injunctive relief, and declaratory relief are dismissed with prejudice.

21 DATED this 8th day of January, 2026.

23 ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE