Tracy A. Haynes, Sr., et al. v. Senoia Carts, et al.

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TRACY A. HAYNES, SR., et al., Case No.: 2:25-cv-02323-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiffs Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 5] SENOIA GOLF CARTS, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On December 30, 2025, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss with 9|| prejudice the plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint or request an extension by the given deadline. ECF No. 5 at 1. The plaintiffs did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15}| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 5) is accepted, and the plaintiffs’ complaint (ECF No. 4) is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

19 DATED this 21st day of January, 2026.

20 Z. - a ANDREWP.GORDON.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE