Nevada Supreme Court, 1865

Hale & Norcross G. & S. M. Co. v. Bajazette & Golden Era G. & S. M. Co.

Hale & Norcross G. & S. M. Co. v. Bajazette & Golden Era G. & S. M. Co.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1865 · Lewis
1 Nev. 322
Hale & Norcross G. & S. M. Co. v. Bajazette & Golden Era G. & S. M. Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Concurring Opinion

Opinion by

Lewis, C. J.,

full Bench concurring.

A motion for a change of venue having been made in this case by the appellant, and the same having been denied by the Court below, an appeal is taken to this Court.

The affidavits upon which the application for change of venue was made, not showing that an impartial trial cannot be had in Storey County, are not sufficient, under the 21st section of the Practice Act, to entitle appellant to a change of venue, it was therefore properly denied.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.