Andrade v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Alcaraz v. Williams (District Court, D. Nevada 2021)
- Palmer (Markiece) v. State (Nev. 2018)
- Allen v. State (Nev. 1980)
- Tucker v. State (Nev. 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
A jury convicted Andrade of the crime of forgery, NRS 205.090, one element of which is the specific intent to defraud, prejudice or damage another. His appellate claim is that he could not have possessed the specific intent required by statute *145 since he was intoxicated. Of course, voluntary intoxication, though not an excuse for crime, may be considered in determining intent, NRS 193.220, and the court so instructed the jury. We assume that the jury did so. King v. State, 80 Nev. 269, 392 P.2d 310 (1964). In any event there is substantial evidence from which the jury could conclude that Andrade’s intoxication was not so gross as to preclude his intention to defraud. King v. State, supra.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.