Marshall v. State
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Nelson (Idaho Ct. App. 1987)
- Roby v. State (Wyo. 1978)
- Sorg v. State (Nev. 1973)
- Williams v. State (Nev. 1972)
- Carpenter v. State (Nev. 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION
Marshall, appellant-defendant, was tried before a jury and *537 found guilty of burglary, a violation of NRS 205.060. Appellant asserts on appeal that there was insufficient evidence adduced at his trial to support his conviction. It is a long established rule of this court that upon appeal we must sustain a conviction if the record contains substantial evidence to support the conviction. We have reviewed the record and find therein substantial evidence to support the appellant’s conviction and prove each and every element of the crime with which he was charged. Coffins v. State, 87 Nev. 436, 488 P.2d 544 (1971); Graham v. State, 86 Nev. 290, 467 P.2d 1016 (1970); McGuire v. State, 86 Nev. 262, 468 P.2d 12 (1970); Cross v. State, 85 Nev. 580, 460 P.2d 151 (1969).
We have reviewed and considered the other assertion of error and find it to be without merit.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.