*319OPINION

By Last Will dated November 6, 1970, Myles Keating bequeathed his estate to his friend and business partner, Larry Horten, and also appointed Horten executor. Keating was not then married. On September 23, 1972, Keating married Myrtle McAvin, to whom he remained married until his death. Provision was not made for Myrtle by marriage contract, by the aforementioned Last Will, nor was she mentioned therein to show an intention not to make provision for her.1 The decedent left no issue, father, mother, brother or sister surviving. The record does not establish whether his estate was his separate property, or his interest in community property.

If he attempted to bequeath his separate estate, and the dis-positive provision of his will was nullified by his subsequent ■marriage to Myrtle, then NRS 134.050(4) provides that such ■separate property shall go to the surviving wife,2 since, in truth, he died intestate. On the other hand, if he attempted to bequeath his interest in community property, and the bequest ■was nullified by reason of his later marriage, such interest would go to Myrtle as his surviving spouse.3

Following a contest of the dispositive provision of the will by Myrtle, the surviving spouse, the district court ruled that the decedent’s estate was to go to Myrtle as though the decedent had died intestate, since, in the circumstances related, the Last *320Will was revoked by his subsequent marriage to her. That ruling was correct. The will was revoked as to Myrtle, and whatever interest she would have taken had her husband died intestate goes to her as the surviving spouse unaffected by the provisions of the will. In re Estate of Stewart, 444 P.2d 337, 338 (Cal. 1968); In re Piatt’s Estate, 183 P.2d 919 (Cal.App. 1947).

Affirmed.