Davis v. Gomez
Nevada Supreme Court
Davis v. Gomez, 92 Nev. 629 (Nev. 1976)
555 P.2d 1228
Davis v. Gomez
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Appellant contends the trial court erred in finding consideration for modification of a written contract. We disagree.
After reviewing the record, we find substantial evidence supporting that finding and, thus, the judgment is affirmed. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc., 92 Nev. 590, 555 P.2d 488 (1976); Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).
Other issues raised by appellant are without merit and we need not consider them.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WILLIAM DAVIS v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published