Davis v. Gomez

Nevada Supreme Court
Davis v. Gomez, 92 Nev. 629 (Nev. 1976)
555 P.2d 1228

Davis v. Gomez

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends the trial court erred in finding consideration for modification of a written contract. We disagree.

After reviewing the record, we find substantial evidence supporting that finding and, thus, the judgment is affirmed. J & J Building Contractors, Inc. v. Savage Construction, Inc., 92 Nev. 590, 555 P.2d 488 (1976); Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Other issues raised by appellant are without merit and we need not consider them.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
WILLIAM DAVIS v. RAMIRO M. GOMEZ
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published