Hilkert v. Sheriff
Hilkert v. Sheriff
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Pursuant to a True Bill returned by the Clark County Grand Jury, William D. Hilkert, III, was indicted for failing to report campaign contributions and failing to report campaign expenses, gross misdemeanors under NRS 294A.010 and 294A.020.
We have previously held that an indictment accusing a public administrator of failing to comply with a statute requiring him to file quarterly reports of all fees and compensation received in his official capacity was defective because it did not allege that he had received such fees or compensation. Adler v. Sheriff, 92 Nev. 436, 552 P.2d 334 (1976).
Here, there is no allegation that Hilkert either received contributions, or incurred expenses; thus, we have the same deficiency which proved to be fatal in Adler. Accordingly, we reverse.
In view of our ruling, it is unnecessary for us to consider the constitutional challenge to the statute. Cf. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
NRS 294A.010(1) provides: “Every candidate for state, district, county, city or township office at a primary or general election shall, within 15 days after the primary election and 30 days after the general election, report the total amount of all of his campaign contributions to the secretary of state on affidavit forms, to be designed and provided by the secretary of state.”
NRS 294A.020(1) provides: “Every candidate for state, district,
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WILLIAM D. HILKERT, III v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published