Gralnick v. Dist. Ct. (Rowe-Gralnick)
Opinion
intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Petitioner has not provided a written order from either the May 29 or June 6, 2013, hearings that petitioner appears to be challenging. 1 This petition is therefore improper, as an oral order is ineffective because the district court remains free to reconsider the issue. Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J. Hardesty
Parraguirre cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge
Moran Law Firm, LLC
Abrams Law Firm, LLC
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Petitioner has also not provided the transcripts from either the May or June 6, 2013, hearings.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.