"random,' fortuitous; [and] 'attenuated' contact" that is insufficient to establish specific personal jurisdiction over respondent. 2 Western Heritage Thrift & Loan v. Cloutier, 107 Nev. 471, 473, 813 P.2d 999, 1000 (1991) (quoting Burger King, 471 U.S. at 475). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

Parraguirre

J. rune

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Morris Paul Weinstein Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

...continued Western Heritage Thrift & Loan v. Cloutier, 107 Nev. 471, 473, 813 P.2d 999, 1000 (1991) (indicating that personal jurisdiction cannot be based on fortuitous contact with the forum state).

Nor does the fact that appellant lived in Nevada while he managed 2 the parties' other non-Nevada-based entities establish general personal jurisdiction over respondent. Trump v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 109 Nev. 687, 699, 857 P.2d 740, 748 (1993) (indicating that general jurisdiction is properly exercised when the defendant's contacts with the forum state "are so substantial or continuous and systematic that [the defendant] may be deemed present in the forum" (quotation omitted)).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A

Kled