Schoka v. Nev, Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Schoka v. Nev, Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Opinion
Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted. See id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1).
It is so ORDERED.
J. esty
Parraguirre
012° Cherry cc: Laszlo Schoka Attorney General/Dep't of Public Safety/Carson City
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
EME
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.