Schoka v. Nev, Dept. of Motor Vehicles

Nevada Supreme Court

Schoka v. Nev, Dept. of Motor Vehicles

Opinion

Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted. See id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1). It is so ORDERED.

J. esty

Parraguirre

012° Cherry

cc: Laszlo Schoka Attorney General/Dep't of Public Safety/Carson City

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

EME

Reference

Status
Unpublished