Morris v. Dist. Ct. (Yampolsky)
Morris v. Dist. Ct. (Yampolsky)
Opinion
course of law. NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Moreover, this court has held that the right to appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the petition, we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
, J. Hardesty
&AAA Parraguirre cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge
Cohen-Johnson LLC
Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A ciffliffiragn isf.1211101
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.