respondents' motion to dismiss.' Appellant's NRCP 60(b) motion failed, however, to provide any argument or additional factual allegations that could have served as a basis for meeting the $10,000 jurisdictional threshold. 2 Consequently, the district court was within its discretion to deny appellant's NRCP 60(b) motion, and we therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty

Parraguirr

J.

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Francis James Johnson Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

'Appellant acknowledges that he received a copy of respondents' motion to dismiss and that he did not file a written opposition to the motion. 2 Appellant's proper person appeal statement likewise fails to do so.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

16111WEEMMEMIIIIFIENMENINSII .,..,31,7744f5111A7,