Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Hampton (Anthony) v. State

Hampton (Anthony) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 13, 2013
Hampton (Anthony) v. State

Opinion

amended notice for habitual criminal treatment under NRS 207.012(2). Both notices included a list of appellant's prior felonies, and respondent presented copies of appellant's judgments of conviction at both sentencings. Furthermore, at the initial sentencing counsel for appellant represented that he had received notice of respondent's intent to seek habitual criminal treatment. Appellant was properly noticed, pursuant to NRS 207.016(2), and we conclude that the district court did not err in adjudicating appellant a habitual criminal under NRS 207.010.

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

J. Hardesty r--

AAA

Parraguirre

Cherry cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

Law Office of Betsy Allen

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.