Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Green (Len) v. State

Green (Len) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 13, 2013
Green (Len) v. State

Opinion

free to leave once detained pursuant to a traffic stop, he is not in custody for Miranda purposes unless the encounter escalates into a formal arrest).

Second, Green contends that the district court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress his statements to law enforcement because they were elicited subsequent to an unconstitutional search. We review de novo the district court's legal determination of the constitutionality of a search but review its findings of fact for clear error.

Somee v. State, 124 Nev. 434, 441, 187 P.3d 152, 157-58 (2008). Because a reasonable officer would have checked on Green's welfare upon learning that he was involved in a traffic accident and discovering him unresponsive, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying Green's motion on this ground. See State v. Rincon, 122 Nev. 1170, 1175- 76, 147 P.3d 233, 237 (2006) (adopting the community caretaking doctrine); People v. Ray, 476-77, 981 P.2d 928, 937 (Cal. 1999) (the community caretaking doctrine applies where an objectively reasonable officer would have perceived a need to protect a member of the community).

Third, Green contends that the district court abused its discretion by allowing witnesses to testify regarding statements that Green's girlfriend made at the scene of the accident. We review a district court's determination as to whether a statement falls within a hearsay exception for an abuse of discretion. Rodriguez v. State, 128 Nev. 273 P.3d 845, 848 (2012). The district court admitted the statements as SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

INSISEIMMISH EMENNIMENIMINIM excited utterances because they were made shortly after perceiving an exciting event while the declarant was under the stress of the event. See NRS 51.095; Rowland v. State, 118 Nev. 31, 42-43, 39 P.3d 114, 121 (2002). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the statements.

Having considered Green's claims and concluded that they lack merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

Parraguirre V Cherry cc: Hon. Alvin R. Kacin, District Judge

Elko County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Elko County District Attorney

Elko County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

MEE '

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.