Zamora-Del Castillo (Gustavo) v. State

would permit withdrawal of a plea after sentencing."); see also NRS 176.165 (a district court may grant a post-conviction motion to withdraw a plea in order to "correct manifest injustice"), he is not entitled to relief because "Padilla does not have retroactive effect." Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. „ 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1105 (2013). Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying Zamora-Del Castillo's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Hardesty r) ‘• "" ss

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge

Mayfield, Gruber & Sheets

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

2Although we filed the fast track statement submitted by Zamora- Del Castillo, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure because it refers to matters in the record without specific citation to the appendix. See NRAP 3C(e)(1)(C); NRAP 28(e)(1). Counsel for Zamora-Del Castillo is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing and appendix requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A