Betts (Michael) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Betts (Michael) v. State

Opinion

Nevada Constitution. The Nevada Revised Statutes reproduce those laws as classified, codified, and annotated by the Legislative Counsel. NRS 220.120. We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

, J Hardesty

cc: Hon. Gary Fairman, District Judge Michael James Betts Attorney General/Carson City Lincoln County District Attorney Attorney General/Ely Lincoln County Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

Reference

Status
Unpublished