Merry v. Widmar
Merry v. Widmar
Opinion
'z~»w@v
An unpub|ishl|»d order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DANIEL V. MERRY, No. 62816 Appellant, VS. K. WIDMAR, INVESTIGATOR FOR § L INVESTIGATORS GENERAL AT ` CENTRAL oFFICE FoR NDoo; LT. MA¥ z l, 2913 SENIOR CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN HENLEY; HEARING cl DISCIPLINARY HEARING SERGEANT BY OFFICER EUGENE MURGIA; CORRECTIONS OFFICERS RoDRIGUES; MECCA; VIRDARRI; ESCUDIA; LT. ARGUELLA; INMATES DAVID BARNHARTT; KEVIN PAME;
l MIKE MENESES (ALL LIVING IN SAME CELL AS PETITIONER); AND DUSTIN GONGAWARE, WHO LIVED IN SAME UNIT AS PETITIONER, BUT LIVED DOWN THE HALL FROM PETITIONER’S CELL,
Resl)ondents.
lE K L|NDEl\/|Al\.’ F S R l\/l" COU
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Appellant’s April 12, 2013, motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal is granted. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed, with the parties to bear their own costs and fees. NRAP 42(b). lt is so ORDERED.
@'¢ww q [email protected]
ccc Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Daniel V. Merry Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SuPnEME Coum' 01= NEvAoA
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished