Gray v. State (Child Custody)
Opinion
An unpub|ishelll order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA sAl\/IY MARIE GRAY, No. 6109’7
Appellant, vs. s l o
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Re§)ondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On December 31, 2012, this court entered an order directing appellant to file her request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant was also cautioned that her failure to either properly seek leave in the-district court or pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or responded to this court’s order. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
BY: ll ‘l))\l\l\§l\r~ cc: Hon. Steven E. Jones, District Judge, Family Court Division Amy Marie Gray ’
Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division
Eighth District Court Clerk
SuPnEME CouFzT oF
NEvADA
CLERK’S ORDER
!3~/~/902
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.