Dickerson v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank
Dickerson v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank
Opinion
An unpub|ishdld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN 'I;`HE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA KAREN R. DICKERSON; AND VELMA No. 61195 J. DICKERSON, App@llants, F § L E § VS. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., MAy z g 2913 Respondent.
TRAC|E K. LlNDEMAN °“f§ “)FLR§E&Y§* BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDE'R DISMISSING APPEAL The parties have filed a stipulation seeking to dismiss this appeal. Having reviewed the stipulation, we approve it. As provided in the stipulation, each party shall bear their own costs and fees. NR.AP 42(b). Accordingly, we g ORDER this appeal DISMISSEDF Pww , @_J_ J cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge l\/lark L. Mausert Smith Larsen & WiXom Washoe District Court Clerk 1In light of this order, we deny as moot the parties’ April 1'7, 2013, joint motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief.
SuPREME CouRT oF NEvADA
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.