(1996) (suggesting that prospective counseling costs may be awarded if set at a fixed amount). Weaver also argues that the district court erred to the extent it awarded restitution to the Victims of Crime Program. Because the judgment of conviction does not direct Weaver to pay restitution to the Victims of Crime Program, we conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we ORDER the amended judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J.

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge State Public Defender/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

2