Appellant pleaded guilty while represented by counsel and assisted by a court interpreter. During the court's canvass, appellant confirmed that the interpreter had done a site translation of the guilty plea agreement for him and that he thoroughly understood all of the contents of the written agreement, which included separate sections addressing the stipulated sentences and the possible immigration consequences of his plea. We discern no abuse of discretion by the district court in denying appellant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 1040, 194 P.3d 1224, 1229-30 (2008); Crawford v. State, 117 at 721-22, 30 P.3d at 1125-26. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

i v CAI lo , J. Douglas

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2