determining whether a defendant has shown 'manifest injustice' that would permit withdrawal of a plea after sentencing."), we conclude that he is not entitled to relief because "Padilla does not have retroactive effect." Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. „ 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1105 (2013). 1 Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not err by denying appellant's motion, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Chesnoff & Schonfeld Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'We are not convinced by appellant's argument that we should, despite the holding of Chaidez, apply Padilla retroactively to correct any alleged manifest injustice.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2