Hall v. Hall

did not abuse its discretion in awarding respondent attorney fees.' See NRS 125.150(3); see also River° v. Rivero, 125 Nev. 410, 441, 216 P.3d 213, 234 (2009) (explaining that a district court must make specific findings of fact regarding the evidence supporting the court's award of attorney fees as a sanction). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J.

J. Saitta cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge

Robert E. Gaston, Settlement Judge

Roberts Stoffel Family Law Group

Sterling Law, LLC

Hofland & Tomsheck

Eighth District Court Clerk

'As NRS 125.150(3) does not require a party to prevail in order to recover attorney fees, we conclude that appellant's argument that respondent could not recover attorney fees because the parties settled their divorce action lacks merit.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A