Moor (Mark) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Moor (Mark) v. State

Opinion

because this court has previously rejected this challenge. 2 See Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 535 P.2d 797 (1975). Further, any challenge to the decision to deny parole was without merit because parole is an act of grace of the State and there is no cause of action when parole has been denied. See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth v. Warden, 105 Nev. 26, 28, 768 P.2d 882, 883 (1989). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Ginons

J. Douglas

Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Mark Moor Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

2SeeMoor v. State, Docket No. 47889 (Order of Affirmance, January 10, 2007); Moor v. Warden, Docket No. 53554 (Order of Affirmance, November 3, 2009).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 0.94f1

grngEMESSMAMRke-17". - i . •=1-47113/fallaRE'W NAME

Reference

Status
Unpublished