Hoffman (Craig) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Hoffman (Craig) v. State
Opinion
court did not abuse its discretion by determining that a mistrial was required by manifest necessity and did not violate Hoffman's double jeopardy rights. See id. at 702, 220 P.3d at 692 ("A deadlocked jury is the classic example of the 'manifest necessity' for mistrial before final verdict that will permit retrial without offense to a defendant's double jeopardy rights."). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Douglas
cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
=ME
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished