Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Gray v. Neven

Gray v. Neven
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 2013

Gray v. Neven

Opinion

An unpub|ishlld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SuPREME Coun‘r oF NEvADA CLERK’S OF|`DEFI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MALCOLM GRAY,

No. 62711 Appellant, DWIGHT NEVEN, Respondent. MAY l ll 2013 N

|E t< LlrifJr`:'l\/\A l:§/Er .

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ev On March 22, 2013, this court entered an order denying appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice.

Further, the order directed appellant to renew his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant was also cautioned thatihis failure to either properly seek leave in the district court or pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or responded to this court’s order. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED. ' CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN BY/:§WML'| §M§[§|.ll¢i cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge . Malcolm Gray Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.