Gray v. Neven

Nevada Supreme Court

Gray v. Neven

Opinion

An unpub|ishlld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123

SuPREME Coun‘r oF NEvADA

CLERK’S OF|`DEFI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MALCOLM GRAY,

No. 62711 Appellant, DWIGHT NEVEN, Respondent. MAY l ll 2013

N

|E t< LlrifJr`:'l\/\A l:§/Er .

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ev

On March 22, 2013, this court entered an order denying appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. Further, the order directed appellant to renew his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant was also cautioned thatihis failure to either properly seek leave in the district court or pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or responded to this

court’s order. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED. '

CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT TRACIE K. LINDEMAN

BY/:§WML'| §M§[§|.ll¢i

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge

. Malcolm Gray Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished