Gray v. Neven
Opinion
An unpub|ishlld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SuPREME Coun‘r oF
NEvADA
CLERK’S OF|`DEFI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MALCOLM GRAY,
No. 62711
Appellant,
DWIGHT NEVEN,
Respondent. MAY l ll 2013
N
|E t< LlrifJr`:'l\/\A l:§/Er .
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ev
On March 22, 2013, this court entered an order denying appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice.
Further, the order directed appellant to renew his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant was also cautioned thatihis failure to either properly seek leave in the district court or pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or responded to this court’s order. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. It is so ORDERED. '
CLERK oF THE SUPREME CoURT
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN
BY/:§WML'| §M§[§|.ll¢i cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge . Malcolm Gray
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.