Depiano (David) v. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court

Depiano (David) v. Warden

Opinion

As a separate and independent ground for affirming the district court's order, appellant's claim was without merit as the Statutes of Nevada contain the laws with the enacting clauses required by the Nevada Constitution. The Nevada Revised Statutes reproduce those laws as classified, codified, and annotated by the Legislative Counsel. NRS 220.120. Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing the petition. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Saitta

cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge David Depiano Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 1947A

1111011fdel - 0*IIAS

Reference

Status
Unpublished