Clark v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Clark v. State

Opinion

An unpub|ishelj order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREl\/[E COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DARRYL ORLANDUS CLARK, No. 6297 8 Appellant,

VS.

THE sTATE oF NEVADA; NEVADA F g L E g DEPARTMENT oF CORRECTIoNS; APR 29 2013 LoVELooK CoRRECTIoNAL

CENTER; QUENTIN BYRNE; JAMES CELRAC'E K-,,L,;~D;Mggu,,, ooX; RoBERT LEGRAND; AND E.K_ . »v D»EPLHYCLERLL/ MCDANIEL,

Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge the district court’s oral ruling granting a motion to dismiss. No appeal may be taken, however, from a district court’s oral ruling. Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev. 686, 689, 747 P.2d 1380, 1382 (1987). Only a final, written judgment has any effect, and thus, only a written judgment may be appealed. Id. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal and we

,J.

‘ ‘

Parauirre Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Darryl Orlandus Clark Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SuPnEME Coum' oF NEvAnA

(o) 1947A ~

Reference

Status
Unpublished