Twin-Vest v. Dist. Ct. (Precision Crushing & Rock Products)

available, however, when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See NRS 34.170; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Petitioners, to the extent that they are aggrieved from the district court's final judgment, will have a speedy and adequate remedy at law in the form of an appeal. Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP 21(b); see Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) ("[T]he issuance of a writ of mandamus or prohibition is purely discretionary with this court."). We further deny as moot petitioners' April 22, 2013, motion for a stay of the district court proceedings.

It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons

Parra guirre -

J.

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge

Law Office of Daniel Marks

Andy J. Kay

Cremen Law Offices

Matthew L. Johnson & Associates

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) (947A