Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Vision Airlines v. United Aviation Serv.'s

Vision Airlines v. United Aviation Serv.'s
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 2013
Vision Airlines v. United Aviation Serv.'s

Opinion

An unpub|ishfld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. SuPREME CouRT oF

NEvAnA

(0> 1947A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

VIsIoN AIRLINES, lNc. D/B/A No. 62332

AVIATIoN VENTURES, INC.; AND 4

VIsIoN AVIATIoN HoLmNGs, INC. § 1 §

D/B/A PREMIER AIRCRAFT s

MANAGEMENT A/K/A AVIATIoN APR 1 1 2013

VENTURES, INC.

TRAC|E K. LINDEMAN

Appellant$, cLERK F PREM comm

UNITED AVIATION SERVICES,

Respondent.

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING APPEAL

On March 14, 2013, appellants filed an amended notice of appeal in the_district court, which was then docketed in this court as a new appeal, Docket No. 62832. Upon further review, it appears that appellants properly amended their original notice of appeal, docketed in Vision Airlines u. United Auiation Serv.’s, Docket No. 62382, to perfect jurisdiction in this court. NRAP 4(a)(6) and (7). Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to (1) transfer to Docket No. 62382 the amended notice of appeal, case appeal statement, and docketing statement that were filed in Docket No. 62832; (2) refund the filing fee paid in Docket No. 62832; and (3) administratively close Docket No. 62832. lt is so ORDERED. )' , c.J.

J cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge

Edward R. Miley, District Judge, Pro Tem

Howard & Howard

Breeden & Associates

Hand Page & Sullivan, LLC

Eighth District Court Clerk

1b -/o,7_'1 8

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.