Nevada Supreme Court, 2013

Misiewicz (William) v. State

Misiewicz (William) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 10, 2013

Misiewicz (William) v. State

Opinion

. (O) 1947A ..,_» 1. . , , .

An unpub|ishec order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WILLIAM CARL MISIEWICZ, NO. 62520 Appellant, THE STATE OF NEVADA, § § R d t. €Sp°“ en APR 1 o 2013

RA \E »<_ l_iNoEr\/\AN T Er E`CO ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion for return of seized evidence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Doug Smith, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for return of seized evidence, we lack jurisdiction.

Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge William Carl MisieWicz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SuPREME Coum' oF NEvAl.')A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.